Proposed
during the Great Depression, Broadacre City reflected the social and economic
uncertainty facing the country at the time. In his 1932 book The Disappearing
City, Wright wrote of the “comfort” of wide spaces and that people of the
future “will have all forms of production, distribution, self improvement,
enjoyment, within a radius of a hundred and fifty miles of his home now easily
and speedily available by means of his car or plane.”Wright’s Broadacre City
called for pockets of community centers or small manufacturing centers, which
were all necessities for society, but they would all be spread out. Roads would
be the crucial artery linking the decentralized settlement. Inter-dispersed
throughout the community would be single-family homes. Some of Wright’s ideas
ultimately took shape in the form of the suburban sprawl observed in the United
States after World War II, and for that reason Wright is aptly labeled as the
prophet of suburbia. But it was the organized and planned nature of the
development that separated Broadacre City and actual developments.
Even
during the initial release in the 1930s, Wright faced much criticism for his
Broadacre City layout proposal. Even before the days of environmentalism that
have since followed, people back then called his plan largely wasteful. Today,
many urban centers are seeking to reverse the effects of suburban sprawl that
took effect in much of the country in the latter half of 20th
century. While Wright’s original model had called for “No traffic problems”
thanks to the decentralization of the city, ironically one of the most negative
consequence of the suburban sprawl has been traffic congestion and
environmental degradation.
Sources:
- http://nextcity.org/daily/entry/frank-lloyd-wrights-utopian-dystopia
- Museum of Modern Art, Frank Lloyd Wright and the City: Density vs. Dispersal